Legislation - Policy

Supreme Court rules against Trump administration on Clean Water rule

In a hit to the Trump administration, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled Monday that cases litigating the Clean Water Act should be heard by federal district courts. The administration had argued that those cases should be heard in Federal Appeals Court.

The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case over an Obama-era regulation, known as the Waters of the United States rule, back in January 2017, after debate as to whether the Court of Appeals or federal district courts had the authority to hear the lawsuits from industry groups and states that say the rule went too far. Dozens of parties had filed lawsuits over the regulation in both federal appeals courts and district courts.

Industry groups involved, led by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), argued that under the Clean Water Act, lower district courts should first hear the challenges, which can then be appealed to the Supreme Court. The Trump administration, on the other hand, said the challenges were legally within the purview of appeals courts because the rule touched on the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) permitting authority.

“Today’s unanimous Supreme Court decision provides much needed clarity and affirms our longstanding position that the […]

More about changes affecting the Clean Water Act:

New rules limiting clean water protections ignore stream science

EPA’s Own Data Refutes Justification for Clean Water Act Rollback

Trump rolls back decades of Clean Water Act protections

Pruitt takes over authority for EPA water protections policy

Don’t be silent about the EPA Clean Water rollback

Watershed Planning Program (WPP) — Massachusetts

Summary
Article Name
Supreme Court rules against Trump administration on Clean Water rule
Description
In a hit to the Trump administration, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled Monday that cases litigating the Clean Water Act should be heard by federal district courts. The administration had argued that those cases should be heard in Federal Appeals Court.
Author
Publisher Name
The Hill
Publisher Logo

Recent Posts

Invisible Threats: Understanding Water Contaminants in the U.S.

Clean water is essential for life, yet millions of Americans unknowingly consume contaminants through their…

1 week ago

High levels of microplastics in human brains appear to be increasing

Human brains contain higher concentrations of microplastics than other organs, according to a new study, and the…

4 weeks ago

California: executive order to help capture and store more water from severe storms

From the Office of the Governor: In anticipation of a multi-day, significant atmospheric river in Northern California,…

1 month ago

Experts give the real facts on California water

From Governor Newsom: Scientists, water managers, state leaders, and experts throughout the state are calling…

2 months ago

Water Quality and Protection

Photo: A harmful algal bloom in Milford Lake, Kansas, made the water appear bright green.…

2 months ago

World’s Fifth-Largest Economy Is About to Ban Most Polystyrene Foam

An expanded plastic foam coffee cup is at a donut shop in Monterey Park, California.…

2 months ago