Legislation - Policy

Water Quality and Protection

Photo: A harmful algal bloom in Milford Lake, Kansas, made the water appear bright green. Kansas Department ofHealth and Environment

Safe and clean water is necessary for human and environmental health and the nation’s economic well-being. Over the past 50 years, the nation’s water quality and drinking water have improved, but threats to water quality and safety remain. 

For example, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the states have identified almost 70,000 water bodies nationwide that do not meet water quality standards. Further, studies show that most people in the U.S. have been exposed to per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFAS)—likely from contaminated water, food, or air. Known as forever chemicals, they can persist in the environment and cause adverse health effects. Additionally, emerging contaminants near military bases and other communities has renewed awareness about the risks that lead and other chemical compounds pose to public health. Nation states, cybercriminals, and hacktivists have also attacked the nation’s water and wastewater systems, making cybersecurity a top concern.

Image: Examples of How Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Enter the Environment

The EPA and other federal agencies face a number of challenges in ensuring that the nation has access to safe and clean water.

For instance: 

  • Contaminants. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), EPA establishes legally enforceable standards that limit the levels of specific contaminants in drinking water. EPA identifies unregulated contaminants, monitors them, and determines whether to regulate them based on things like how dangerous they are to public health, and how often they occur. Public water systems must comply with monitoring, reporting, and other requirements established by EPA and responsible states. But the data that states reported to EPA did not always reflect the frequency of health-based and monitoring violations by community water systems or the status of enforcement actions. Regarding certain PFAS contaminants, public water systems will need to implement a treatment method by 2029. But treating PFAS in drinking water also creates waste that needs to be properly disposed of to avoid future environmental contamination.
  • Cybersecurity. Nations, cybercriminals, and others have targeted some of the nearly 170,000 U.S. water and wastewater systems, which are increasingly automated. A cyberattack on U.S. drinking and wastewater systems could, for example, produce drinking water with unsafe levels of bacteria or chemicals. EPA leads water cybersecurity efforts with the Department of Homeland Security, and has worked with the water sector to improve cybersecurity. However, EPA hasn’t identified and prioritized the greatest risks sector-wide. It also relies on water systems to voluntarily agree to improve cybersecurity.
  • Infrastructure funding. The EPA estimates that over $630 billion will be needed to overhaul clean water and wastewater infrastructure over the next 20 years. EPA’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund gives states grants to build or replace such infrastructure. However, this money is allocated using a formula from 1987—which does not reflect states’ current population and clean water needs.
  • Lead in drinking water. Lead in drinking water comes primarily from corrosion of service lines that connect the water main to a building. The Lead and Copper Rule requires water systems to test for lead and treat water to help prevent corroded pipes from leaching lead. Many water systems face challenges identifying areas at risk of having lead service lines. By developing guidance for water systems that outlines methods for identifying high-risk locations using publicly available data, EPA could better ensure that public water systems test water samples from locations at greater risk of having lead service lines. This could also help identify areas with vulnerable populations to focus lead service line replacement efforts. However, EPA’s existing guidance excludes the use of American Community Survey data on neighborhood characteristics with geospatial data, which could ensure that public water systems identify high-risk locations. Additionally, lead in drinking water in childcare settings (such as Head Start) is also a concern. However, the Department of Health and Human Services has not finished developing a rule to require testing for lead in drinking water in Head Start facilities. EPA’s Lead and Copper Rule Improvements rule issued October 2024 includes requirements for water sampling, public education and other actions involving schools and child care facilities.
  • Nonpoint source pollution. States also play a key role in managing water pollution from nonpoint sources—such as runoff from farms, parking lots, or streets—which is the leading cause of pollution of the nation’s waters. States set water quality standards, monitor water quality, and identify water bodies that do not meet their standards. For waters that do not meet water quality standards, states must develop Total Maximum Daily Loads—a pollutant budget—which EPA approves. EPA and the states then work to restrict pollution to these levels, such as by providing incentives to landowners to reduce nonpoint source pollution. However, this program relies on voluntary measures, leaving many of the nation’s waters impaired and the goals of the Clean Water Act unmet. The Clean Water Act prohibits the discharge of pollutants from point sources into waters of the United States without a permit from EPA or an authorized state.
  • Climate change. Extreme weather related to climate change potentially threatens utilities that produce drinking water and treat wastewater. EPA provides significant financial resources to assist utilities in repairing and replacing their infrastructure. It also provides technical assistance to utilities to improve their resilience to extreme weather. However, EPA’s program is small and can’t help nationwide. But the EPA could organize a network of technical advisors to assist nationally.
  • Watershed restoration. EPA has undertaken large-scale…

Full article: U.S. Govt. General Accounting Office

Recent Posts

California: executive order to help capture and store more water from severe storms

From the Office of the Governor: In anticipation of a multi-day, significant atmospheric river in Northern California,…

1 week ago

Experts give the real facts on California water

From Governor Newsom: Scientists, water managers, state leaders, and experts throughout the state are calling…

2 weeks ago

World’s Fifth-Largest Economy Is About to Ban Most Polystyrene Foam

An expanded plastic foam coffee cup is at a donut shop in Monterey Park, California.…

1 month ago

Michael Fitzgerald: Worst. Invasive. Species. Ever.

Nutrias were first discovered in the marshes of San Joaquin County in 2017. (Photo courtesy…

1 month ago

Seawater Intrusion Threatens Salinas Valley: Crisis Inaction | Opinion

The Armstrong Ranch property, which occupies both sides of Highway 1, sits atop aquifers that…

1 month ago

Saltwater intrusion will taint 77% of coastal aquifers by century’s end, modeling study finds

Watersheds on the U.S. Eastern Seaboard will be among the areas most affected by underground…

2 months ago