Public health

Who Pays to Get Forever Chemicals Out of Drinking Water? It Could Be You

Officials say settlements with 3M and DuPont won’t cover all of the costs of building new filtration systems

Photo: Wausau, Wis., says it is in line to get about $65 million from PFAS settlements before attorneys’ fees.

Forever chemicals have shown up in drinking water across the country. Now they are appearing in homeowners’ soaring utility bills.

Water systems are spending millions of dollars to filter out PFAS, the long-lasting compounds commonly known as forever chemicals, which have been linked to cancer and other health problems. 

Earlier this year 3MDuPont and two other companies agreed to proposed class-action settlements of contamination claims for up to $13.7 billion, but some water providers are already passing the cleanup cost on to customers.

Communities including Hawthorne, N.J., Wellesley, Mass., and Wausau, Wis., have boosted their water rates by 13% to more than 50% after the discovery of PFAS, or perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, led them to build new filtration systems or buy water from other sources. 

Jim Wagner, a Wausau laundry owner, said he lost customers when he raised the price of using a washing machine by 50 cents. Wausau resident Jaime Pittsley said his water bills have more than doubled even though his family switched to drinking bottled water.

“I don’t feel that the residents should be taking the brunt of the cost for this,” Pittsley said. “I think these companies definitely should be footing the bill.”

Wausau, a city of 40,000 in central Wisconsin, is in line to get about $65 million from the settlements before attorneys’ fees, but it still faces the potential for stricter regulations and further cleanup costs, Mayor Katie Rosenberg said.

She said it is too soon to talk about cutting water rates. “That’d be a discussion that we would be able to have more robustly once we have some of those dollars in our account,” said Rosenberg.

3M said it agreed with plaintiffs’ attorneys that the settlement is the right way to move forward. DuPont and two related companies included in the lawsuits, Corteva and Chemours, issued a statement Dec. 22 saying they remain in favor of the settlement.  

In recent years hundreds of municipalities have sued PFAS manufacturers, alleging that the companies knew that the chemicals would contaminate aquifers. The companies, while seeking to settle the litigation, say PFAS haven’t been shown […]

Full article: www.wsj.com

Recent Posts

Scathing report released detailing Navy’s handling of Red Hill fuel spill

The Inspector General of the Department of Defense released some scathing reports Thursday over the…

5 days ago

Growing Food Instead of Grass Lawns in California Front Yards

Photo: Morgan Boone, a volunteer with Crop Swap LA, harvested lettuce at the La Salle…

2 weeks ago

LA River restoration connects us back to ‘the life force of our city’

Los Angeles residents at a section of the Los Angeles River cleanup in Los Angeles,…

3 weeks ago

LAist: New study raises questions about heavy metals in fire retardants

Over the past decade, about 67 million gallons of fire retardant have been dropped on…

3 weeks ago

Meadow and watershed restoration in the Golden Trout Wilderness

Photo: Golden Trout Wilderness Seeking blue, seeing gold The Kern Plateau features a chain of…

3 weeks ago

First sighting of salmon in 100 years marks key milestone for California dam removal

For the first time in more than a century, a salmon was observed swimming through Klamath…

4 weeks ago